AMI: FDA 'User Fees' should not pay for FSMA

AMI: FDA 'User Fees' should not pay for FSMA

In a letter to the Chairman and Ranking Member of the House Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the American Meat Institute (AMI) and 16 other food and beverage trade associations urged the committee against using FDA “user fees” to pay for implementation of the Food Safety Modernisation Act (FSMA).

President Obama signed FSMA into law on January 4, 2011. FDA’s 2012 budget proposal released by the administration on February 14 targets raising revenue from these new fees starting in 2013 to assist FDA implement the new law. Congress rejected such fees during congressional consideration of FSMA.

The letter notes that the White House has requested targeted funds for FSMA’s implementation of $100 million for 2012. However, congressional budget experts predict it will take at least $300 million a year to implement.

Given that discrepancy, the administration should have requested more funds for FDA in their budget submission rather than relying on congressionally rejected user fees to make up the difference, the letter continued. Imposing new fees on food facilities would represent a food safety tax on consumers. As food companies and consumers continue to cope with a period of pro-longed economic turbulence, the creation of a new food tax would mean higher costs for businesses and higher food prices for consumers.

A copy of the letter is available here.
Source: American Meat Institute


With our free newsletters, we can provide you with the most important industry news and useful practical tips from Germany and around the world.